Archive for the ‘Published in’ Category

By  and ZIA ur-REHMAN

March 28, 2013

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/world/asia/taliban-extending-reach-across-pakistan.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

KARACHI, Pakistan — This seaside metropolis is no stranger to gangland violence, driven for years by a motley collection of armed groups who battle over money, turf and votes.

But there is a new gang in town. Hundreds of miles from their homeland in the mountainous northwest, Pakistani Taliban fighters have started to flex their muscles more forcefully in parts of this vast city, and they are openly taking ground.

Shahi Syed of the Awami National Party in Pakistan said, “We are the Taliban’s first enemy.”

Taliban gunmen have mounted guerrilla assaults on police stations, killing scores of officers. They have stepped up extortion rackets that target rich businessmen and traders, and shot dead public health workers engaged in polio vaccination efforts. In some neighborhoods, Taliban clerics have started to mediate disputes through a parallel judicial system.

The grab for influence and power in Karachi shows that the Taliban have been able to extend their reach across Pakistan, even here in the country’s most populous city, with about 20 million inhabitants. No longer can they be written off as endemic only to the country’s frontier regions.

In joining Karachi’s street wars, the Taliban are upending a long-established network of competing criminal, ethnic and political armed groups in this combustible city. The difference is that the Taliban’s agenda is more expansive — it seeks to overthrow the Pakistani state — and their operations are run by remote control from the tribal belt along the Afghan border.

Already, the militants have reshaped the city’s political balance by squeezing one of the most prominent political machines, the Pashtun-dominated Awami National Party, off its home turf. They have scared Awami operatives out of town and destroyed offices, gravely undercutting the party’s chances in national elections scheduled for May.

“We are the Taliban’s first enemy,” said Shahi Syed, the party’s provincial head, at his newly fortified office. “They burn my offices, they tear down my flags and they kill our people.”

The Taliban drift into Karachi actually began years ago, though much more quietly. Many fled here after a concerted Pakistani military operation in the Swat Valley in 2009. The influx has gradually continued, officials here say, with Taliban fighters able to easily melt into the city’s population of fellow ethnic Pashtuns, estimated to number at least five million people.

Until recently, the militants saw Karachi as a kind of rear base, using the city to lie low or seek medical treatment, and limiting their armed activities to criminal fund-raising, like kidnapping and bank robberies.

But for at least six months now, there have been signs that their timidity is disappearing. The Taliban have become a force on the street, aggressively exerting their influence in the ethnic Pashtun quarters of the city.

Taliban tactics are most evident in Manghopir, an impoverished neighborhood of rough, cinder-block houses clustered around marble quarries on the northern edge of the city, where illegal housing settlements spill into the surrounding desert.

In recent months, Taliban militants have attacked the Manghopir police station three times, killing eight officers, said Muhammad Aadil Khan, a local member of Parliament.

In interviews, residents describe Taliban militants who roam on motorbikes or in jeeps with tinted windows, delivering extortion demands in the shape of two bullets wrapped in a piece of paper.

A factory owner in Manghopir, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear for his safety, said that several Pashtun businessmen had received demands for $10,000 to $50,000. The figure was negotiable, he said, but payment was not: resistance could result in an assault on the victim’s house or, in the worst case, a bullet to the head.

Mr. Khan said he had not dared to visit his constituency in months. “There is a personal threat against me,” he said, speaking at the headquarters of his party, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, which represents ethnic Mohajirs, in the city center.

The militant drive has even distressed Manghopir’s most revered residents: the dozens of crocodiles who inhabit a pool near a Sufi shrine here.

The Muslim pilgrims who come here to pay homage to the shrine’s saint have long also brought scraps of meat for his reptile charges.

But lately, as visitor numbers have dwindled from hundreds per day to barely a few dozen, the roughly 120 crocodiles here have grown hungry, according to the animals’ elderly caretaker.

Police officials, militant sources and Pashtun residents say that three major Taliban factions operate in Karachi — the most powerful one, which is rooted in South Waziristan and dominated by the Mehsud tribe, and two others from the Swat and Mohmand areas.

A senior city police officer, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that militant commanders with those factions send operational orders to Karachi from the tribal belt; while some captured militants have tried to justify their activities by citing the authorization of religious clerics in the northwest.

In cases, he added, regular criminal groups have posed as Taliban fighters in a bid to increase their power of intimidation.

Just why the Taliban are adopting such an aggressive profile in Karachi right now is unclear. Some cite the greater number of militants fleeing Pakistani military operations in the northwest; others say it may be the product of dwindling funds, as jihadi donors in the Persian Gulf states turn to the Middle East.

In any event, it has shaken the city’s bloody ethnic politics.

Since the 1980s, armed supporters of the Mohajir-dominated Muttahida Qaumi Movement have engaged in tit-for-tat violence with those of the Pashtun-dominated Awami National Party. In the worst periods, dozens of people have died in a day. Now, faced with a common enemy, figures in both parties say they have declared an uneasy, unofficial truce.

As well as the attack on the Awami party — which have seen it close 44 of its district offices across the city — the Pakistan Taliban claimed responsibility for two attacks on the Muttahida Qaumi Movement — first, a bombing that killed four people, then the assassination of a party parliamentarian.

In a recent interview with The New York Times in North Waziristan, the Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan said the group was targeting both parties — as well as President Asif Ali Zardari’s Pakistan Peoples Party — for their “liberal” policies.

The security forces, shaken out of complacency, have begun a number of major anti-Taliban operations. The latest of those occurred on March 23 when hundreds of paramilitary Rangers raided a residential area in Manghopir, near the crocodile shrine, confiscating a cache of more than 50 weapons and rounding up 200 people, 16 of whom were later identified as militants and detained.

“I don’t think the Taliban would like to set Karachi aflame, because they fear the reaction against them,” said Ikram Seghal, a security consultant in Karachi. “The police and intelligence agencies have very good information about them.”

Other factors limit the Pakistani Taliban’s ingress into Karachi. One of the more provocative ones is that allied militants — particularly the Afghan Taliban — might not like the added publicity. The Afghan wing has long used the city as place to rest and resupply. There are longstanding rumors that the movement’s leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, is taking shelter here, and that his leadership council, known as the Quetta Shura, has met in Karachi.

In such a vast and turbulent city, the Taliban may become just another turf-driven gang. But without a determined response from the security forces, experts say, they could also seek to become much more.

Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud contributed reporting from North Waziristan, Pakistan.

 

Politics of fear

Posted: April 2, 2013 in The Friday Times

tft-logo

 

by Zia Ur Rehman

March 29-April 4, 2013

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130329&page=4

Amid threats by the Taliban, a number of politicians in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA are abandoning liberal political parties to join religious groups or contest independently.

In recent messages, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has warned people to stay away from the gatherings organized by the Awami National Party (ANP), Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). Political analysts say the threats will help religious parties in the coming elections.

The ANP and the PPP opposed the Taliban during their five year rule that just ended. Taliban and other militant groups have killed a large number of political leaders and workers and threatened many others. That, analysts say, may have a negative impact on the elections.

In 2012, at least 29 reported terrorist attacks on politicians in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA left 28 people dead, according to the Pakistan Security Report 2012, an annual publication of Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS). Top leaders of the ANP, the Qaumi Watan Party (formerly PPP-Sherpao) and even Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) have survived in suicide attacks.

“The poor security situation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa indicates that incidents of violence are likely in the elections,” said Sardar Ahmed Yousafzai, a political analyst based in Swat. He said the Taliban were still in a position to carry out sabotage acts, even in sensitive areas.

Most districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are being seen as sensitive from the security point of view, especially Tank, Dera Ismail Khan, Bannu, Lukki Marwat, Kohat, Hangu, Peshawar, Charsadda, Swat, Buner and Dir.

In a recent move, Istiqbal Khan, an outgoing MNA elected from district Buner on an ANP ticket, decided to join JUI-F. MPAs Fazal Shakoor from Charsadda and Sajjadullah Khan from Kohistan, also from the ANP, have already joined JUI-F. Other politicians who have recently defected to JUI-F include Mehboobullah Jan of PPP (an outgoing MNA from Kohistan), Zar Gul and Zarin Gul of PML-Q (former MPAs from Torghar district), and Atiqur Rehman of QWP (an outgoing MPA).

“A fear of Taliban attacks has compelled a number of leaders of liberal political parties to change loyalty and join religious groups,” said an aide of an ANP parliamentarian who recently joined JUI-F.

Other ANP leaders disagree. “Some ANP members joined other political parties because they were not considered for party tickets. It is more about tickets than protection,” said Bushra Gohar, ANP’s central vice president. She did acknowledge that the ANP will face serious security challenges in the elections. “But that will not deter us or weaken our resolve.”

Ijaz Khan, a Peshawar-based political observer, agrees some ANP leaders are abandoning the party because they have not been awarded tickets, but believes threats by the Taliban are also a genuine concern.

Political workers are concerned about their safety. “We cannot move freely to mobilize our supporters or run an election campaign in the province because of security threats posed by the Taliban,” said an ANP worker in Buner. “Our rivals from the JI can easily organize rallies and public gatherings.”

Some observers say the leaders of ANP, PPP and QWP are cut off from the people because of security fears, and that is sending voters away towards other political parties. “The right-leaning parties have easier access to the people because of their softer views on Taliban,” said an ANP activist from Buner. He said the militants were trying to bring pro-Taliban right-wing political parties in the parliament.

Political analyst Jan Achakzai disagrees. He said Fazlur Rehman, the chief of JUI-F, has changed his strategy. “He opened his party’s doors to people other than just clerics,” Achakzai said, “reaching out to leaders of the ANP and the PPP.” He said Fazl was making his group a moderate center-right party. “Now, peace, economy and foreign policy are the core issues.”

Threats of violence by the Taliban have worried leaders of the ANP and the PPP, but it has also created fear among the ranks of right-wing political parties. “Militant outfits are also targeting the JUI-F ever since the party started condemning suicide attacks in Pakistan,” said a leader from Bannu, requesting anonymity for security reasons. He said attacks on Fazlur Rehman and the recent killing of JUI-F workers was proof that the Taliban and the JUI-F were not ideologically aligned.

The writer is a journalist and researcher. Email: zia_red@hotmail.com and Twitter: @zalmayzia

email_banner_en_GB

 

by Zia Ur Rehman

March 15, 2013

http://centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/main/2013/03/15/feature-01

KARACHI – Karachi police are investigating the March 13 killing of Pakistani social activist Parveen Rehman, the long-time director of the Orangi Pilot Project (OPP). The OPP works on sanitation, healthcare, education and microfinancing in poor Karachi neighbourhoods.

Two men on a motorcycle opened fire on Rehman’s car on Manghopir Road, eyewitnesses said. She died en route to the hospital, senior police officer Javed Odho told Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

Civil society activists protest March 14 outside the Karachi Press Club, condemning the March 13 killing of Karachi social activist Parveen Rehman. Police suspect it was another Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan attack. [Zia Ur Rehman]

Nobody has taken responsibility, but police suspect Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants of being behind the killing and identified alleged TTP member Qari Bilal as a suspect, officials said.

A resident of South Waziristan, Bilal reportedly belongs to the TTP’s Sher Khan faction. Informers have identified him as the deputy commander of the banned TTP’s Manghopir chapter.

Police on March 15 conducted an operation in which they were trying to capture or kill Bilal, Ashfaq Baloch, station house officer at the Manghopir police station, said. At least one militant was killed in the operation, but details about who was killed could not be confirmed.

Although Rehman had no known enemies, her fight against land grabs and rampant water theft from pumping stations in and around Karachi might have angered those involved in those multi-million-rupee rackets, some of her colleagues said.

Karachi residents March 14 attend the funeral of Karachi social activist Parveen Rehman, who was assassinated March 13. [Zia Ur Rehman]

Scores of mourners from various NGOs, trade unions and civil society attended her funeral prayer March 14 in Gulistan-e-Jauhar.

Attacks ‘senseless and barbaric’

Outrage and grief followed her killing.

Civil society activists and Karachi University students March 14 protested outside the Karachi Press Club, where they held placards condemning extremist violence and chanted slogans like “Down with terrorism.”

“Rehman’s killing is a serious attempt to demoralise the forces of peace and development in the country,” said Zahid Farooq, a representative of the Urban Resource Centre, a Karachi-based civil society organisation.

Pakistani officials and civil society groups publicly condemned the act as “senseless and barbaric.”

Calling it “inhuman,” Sindh Governor Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad ordered Sindh Police Chief Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh to submit an incident report and to have law enforcement agencies examine all security camera video footage of entry and exit points near the crime scene.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan condemned the killing of Rehman in a statement that urged the public to “stand up against those who are destroying the symbols of hope.”

“Her assassination was a cruel blow to the country’s civil society and a great loss to the nation,” it read.

Devoted to helping Pakistan’s poor

Rehman devoted her life to the development of impoverished neighbourhoods across the country, to civil society and to development, her friends told Central Asia Online.

She threw herself into promoting low-cost housing plans, rehabilitating refugees from floods in rural Sindh and monitoring developers’ encroachment on scarce land in crowded Karachi, according to Farooq. The organisation she ran, the OPP, is one of Asia’s largest slum improvement projects.

Trained as an architect, she moved into aid and sanitation work and in the 1990s helped to build a sanitation system that others replicated across Pakistan, said Abdul Waheed, head of the Bright Educational Society, a Karachi-based NGO.

She never married and remained committed to her work, he added.

Militant attacks on activists a ‘crucial’ concern

Rehman’s killing highlights Pakistan’s alarming trend of militant attacks on activists and aid workers.

In 2012, Pakistan and South Sudan tied as the second most dangerous country for aid workers with 15 attacks each, behind only Afghanistan (44 attacks), according to the Aid Workers Security Database (AWSD). Somalia and Syria rounded out the five most dangerous countries.

In 2011, aid workers in Pakistan suffered 12 attacks, according to the AWSD. Before 2009, three or fewer attacks occurred annually.

NGOs and aid organisations are seen as promoting secular values and modern norms, which the Taliban vehemently oppose because of their extremist view of Islam, said Raees Ahmed, a Karachi-based security analyst. Consequently, many aid organisations have ordered their staff to restrict nighttime travel and avoid high-risk areas.

Unfortunately, the attacks are compelling some humanitarian groups to suspend their activities in the country altogether – leaving the needy to suffer, Waheed told Central Asia Online.

“Violence against aid workers is one of the most crucial humanitarian issues today,” he said.

 

email_banner_en_GB

 

by Zia Ur Rehman

March 11, 2013

http://centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/main/2013/03/11/feature-02

KARACHI – The Pakistani navy March 8 concluded five days of multi-national training operations in the North Arabian Sea 32km from Karachi in efforts to bolster international co-operation and to ensure peace and stability in the region.

Twelve other countries took part, while 32 observed the AMAN-13 exercises.

Pakistani naval troops conduct a counter-terrorism exercise during the AMAN-13 multi-national naval exercise in Karachi March 5. AMAN-13 is the fourth in a biennial series of exercises conducted off Pakistan’s coast, the Pakistani navy said in a statement. [REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro]

Ships, helicopters, submarines and special forces conducted anti-piracy drills, surface-to-surface target practice, vessel personnel transfers and provisioning, helicopter-to-ship boarding manoeuvres, anti-submarine warfare, and search and rescue operations during the drill organised by the Pakistani navy, a navy spokesperson told Central Asia Online.

In one exercise they carried out a scenario in which “pirates” had hijacked a ship. After organisers fired a flare to mark the distressed ship’s location, special forces descended upon it by helicopter and speedboat to take control of the vessel after “clashing with the pirates.”

The exercises are designed to provide a common forum for information sharing, mutual understanding and identifying areas of common interest among regional actors, Pakistani fleet commander Rear Admiral Khan Hasham bin Saddique said March 4 during the opening ceremonies.

“The slogan for the exercise is ‘Together for Peace,’ and all nations participating in the AMAN-13 share a common objective of ensuring peace and stability in the maritime arena,” he said.

Sharpened skills and collaboration counter maritime threats

The key objectives of the naval exercises include displaying a united resolve against terrorism and crimes and contributing toward regional peace and stability to bridge between regions, naval officials said. The exercise mainly focused on issues related to piracy, sea terrorism, human trafficking, and protection of marine interests and international trade.

Such multi-national exercises can clear shipping routes of such threats, observers say.

“Several threats complicate the security matrix in the Indian Ocean,” said defence analyst and columnist S.M. Hali. Shipping lanes in the Indian Ocean have been plagued by attacks by Somali pirates, who have hijacked dozens of ships and demanded millions of dollars in ransom for their release.

Piracy in the Indian Ocean, supported by Al-Qaeda-backed militant groups including Al-Shabaab, has become a huge global problem that threatens the international shipping industry, Pakistani seamen’s trade union leader Amajd Ali Shah told Central Asia Online. “It needs a globally joint and concentrated effort to curb it,” he said.

“Piracy and pirates are the most rising threat, which could be countered by collaboration of navies and by sharing tactics with each other,” Saddique said.

The Pakistani navy has always supported international efforts against terrorism and piracy, and the navy and other maritime forces of the country are proactively engaged in maintaining and further improving their capabilities, he said.

Hali agreed.

Successful execution of AMAN-13 is a significant demonstration of Pakistan’s commitment toward peace and stability through collaborative maritime security between navies of the different countries, he said.

Growing co-operation

This year’s event marked the fourth bi-ennial AMAN training operation since its inception in 2007, Saddique said. It provides a platform for information sharing, for developing tactics against asymmetrical and traditional threats and for boosting interoperability among all navies working in the region.

“All continents of the world are represented in the exercise to promote peace and stability in the region,” he said.

 

 

email_banner_en_GB

By Zia Ur Rehman

March 7, 2013

http://centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/main/2013/03/07/feature-01

KARACHI – After continual attacks on Sufi spiritual leaders and shrines, the Sindh government devised a strategy to provide security to the shrines and spiritual leaders across the province.

On February 25, a blast tore through the Ghulam Shah Ghazi shrine in Marri village in Shikarpur District, killing four people on the scene and wounding more than 27 others. Pir Syed Hajan Shah – a spiritual leader and Gaddin Nasheen (spiritual descendant) of the saint honoured at the shrine – later succumbed to his wounds March 4.

Members of Sufi groups, religious groups and civil society outside the Karachi Press Club February 26 protest against recent attacks on Sufi shrines and spiritual leaders in Sindh. The Sindh government has devised a strategy to protect Sufi shrines and spiritual leaders across the province. [Zia Ur Rehman]

After news spread of Shah’s death, markets, businesses and trade centres across Sindh closed down March 5 voluntarily to honour him, media reported.

Militants also attacked the convoy of spiritual leader Syed Hussain Shah – popularly known as Saeen Hussain Shah Qambar – February 20 with a remote-controlled bomb in the Ahmed Deen Brohi area of Jacobabad District. He escaped unharmed, but the bomb killed his grandson Shafiq Shafi Shah and injured eight others.

Besides prompting more aggressive security measures, the attacks have elicited broad condemnation.

Government security measures

In a February 28 press release, Sindh police chief Fayyaz Ahmed Leghari called for reinforced security at the Sufi shrines, dargahs (a Sufi shrine built over a religious figure’s grave), mosques and imambargahs (Shia congregation halls) in the province.

“[Cell phone] jammers, walk-through gates and security barriers have been installed in all shrines, while officers in charge of all police stations have been directed to increase police patrolling in the areas where Sufi shrines are situated,” Pir Muhammad Shah, a senior police officer in Sukkar, told Central Asia Online.

Authorities also arranged meetings with caretakers of various shrines and spiritual leaders to work out security strategies, he said.

Leghari also ordered deployment of plainclothes police to be deployed and for security upgrades for spiritual leaders.

Police raids resulted in the arrests of six militant suspects in connection with both attacks, Sindh media reported. Officials are interrogating the suspects, said Parvaiz Chandio, a police official in Shikarpur.

Intelligence agencies have declared 15 Sufi shrines of Sindh “sensitive” and asked the provincial government to provide them with fool-proof security, said Nasir Shaikh, a Hyderabad-based journalist, citing some official reports.

Shrines honouring Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai (Bhit Shah), Laal Shahbaz Qalandar (Sehwan), Sakhi Abdul Wahab Shah (Hyderabad), and Baba Salauddin (Kotri) are among those declared sensitive, he said.

Attacks draw broad condemnation

Additionally, the Sindh Assembly February 27 passed a resolution condemning attacks on religious scholars and shrines.

“The recent attacks on spiritual leaders in Sindh were carried out by banned organisations and were a continuation of the vicious campaign against the Hazara community in Balochistan,” said Imran Zafar Leghari, a parliamentarian belonging to the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), who presented the resolution in the assembly.

“Sindh is the land of Sufis and saints who preached peace and love,” he told Central Asia Online, adding that the provincial government is devising a strategy to protect Sufi shrines and religious scholars from banned extremist outfits.

Sindh’s civil society and progressive political parties also denounced the attacks and have started a joint campaign against militancy in the province. Even before the Ghulam Shah Ghazi shrine bombing, they were reacting with outrage.

Nine progressive political parties of Sindh and civil society organisations February 24 conducted province-wide protests.

The people of Sindh typically reject aggression, militancy and extremism, said Ilahi Buksh Bikak, a leader of the Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz political party who attended a protest that day held outside the Karachi Press Club.

“Islam spread in the Sindh region thanks to great Sufi preachers, not because of Arab fighters,” Bikak told Central Asia Online, adding that Sufis spread a message of love, peace and interfaith harmony.

Militants target Sufi shrines

Taliban militants have frequently targeted Sufi shrines in Pakistan, especially in the Pashtun regions, and have now started targeting them in Punjab and Sindh, Sufi leaders say.

The militants justify their attacks on shrines and other cultural symbols as attempts at constructing a new culture and identity, said Abdul Majid Baqi, a Lahore-based Sufi researcher, adding that such extremists often follow a philosophy that conflicts with Sufi Islam.

End

tft-logo

By Zia Ur Rehman

March 15-21, 2013

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130315&page=7

Former president and chief of All Pakistan Muslim League (APML) Gen (r) Pervez Musharraf has announced he will contest the upcoming elections from Chitral.

Chitral is the most northerly district of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and situated in its Malakand division. There is one National Assembly constituency in Chitral (NA-32) and two provincial assembly constituencies (PK-89 and PK-90).

APML information secretary Asiya Ishaq is very optimistic. She said the people of Chitral had a deep love for Musharraf and vice versa. “During Gen (r) Musharraf’s tenure as president, large sums were spent on the development of basic infrastructure in the city,” she said. “And especially, the opening of Lowari Tunnel connected the rugged mountainous valley with the rest of the country.”

Local political analysts say the Lowari Tunnel was indeed a big achievement that makes him a stronger candidate from NA-32, but the political situation on the ground is completely different from how his party sees it.

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) are the key political parties that have strong organizational set-up in Chitral district. The Awami National Party (ANP), having contested elections from the district since 1970, has also emerged as an influential electoral party this time, especially after its provincial government carried out several development projects in the valley.

Sahibzada Muhayuddin of Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) won the NA-32 seat in the 2008 elections, and JI’s Abdul Akbar Chitrali won the seat on a Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal’s ticket in 2002.PML-Q’s Ghulam Muhammad and PPP’s Saleem Khan (incumbent minister of population welfare) were elected from PK-89 and PK-90 respectively in 2008.Musharraf and Chitrali are the only two leaders who have announced their candidacy so far. Although the PPP is still a popular political party in Chitral, it has not won the National Assembly seat since the 1988 general elections. Begum Nusrat Bhutto won the NA-32 seat in the 1988 elections, followed by another PPP candidate Ghafoor Shah after she relinquished it.

Local political workers say Chitral was once regarded as the second Larkana, but internal differences in the party at the district level hurt its popularity in the valley. Sources in the PPP say Asma Arbab Alamgir, wife of federal minister Arbab Alamgir, is also planning to contest the National Assembly elections from Chitral. Col (r) Sardar Muhammad Khan and Maulana Abdul Rehman are possible candidates from the ANP and the JUI-F respectively. But local analysts believe the actual battle on NA-32 will be between Musharraf and Chitrali.

Musharraf was invited to contest the elections from Chitral by Sahibzada Muhayuddin, the incumbent MNA. The Ismaili community has also decided to support the former president. If Musharraf does not return to Pakistan, his wife Sehba Musharraf may be the alternate candidate.

Sources in the APML say the Muttahida Qaumi Movement had also promised to support Musharraf on a constituency in Karachi, but it seems to have backed out.

“Surprisingly, a number of possible candidates from Chitral are taking Musharraf seriously and are opting for the provincial seats instead,” tweeted Khalid Munir, a political analyst.

But Abdul Akbar Chitrali rejects the perception that Musharraf is a popular candidate from Chitral. “He should come to Pakistan before talking about where he would contest the elections from,” he said. Chitrali is the nephew of late Maulana Abdul Rahim, an influential cleric who also elected MNA in the 1993 polls
.

tft-logo

 

 

By Zia Ur Rehman

March 1-7, 2013

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130301&page=3

Maulvi Faqir, an important Taliban commander from Bajaur Agency, has been arrested by Afghan intelligence in its eastern Nangarhar province.

“On February 18, Faqir was arrested along with four other militants while he was trying to enter Tirah valley of Khyber Agency from Momand Darra district of Nangarhar,” said a journalist based in Jalalabad. He said the arrest was made jointly by Afghan Police and the National Directorate of Security (NDS), Afghanistan’s premier intelligence agency. He is said to be under interrogation at an NDS detention center in Kabul.

Faqir is a key Taliban commander who leads his group in Bajaur Agency and Kunar and Nuristan provinces of Afghanistan. He was the deputy chief of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) but left the organization in November 2011 after telling Pakistani media that the TTP were holding peace talks with the government. In November 2011, a foreign news agency reported that a ceasefire had been brokered between the military and the Pakistani Taliban, but an army spokesman refuted the report strongly and categorically, calling it “concocted, baseless and unfounded”. But Faqir admitted in December 2011 that “negotiations are in progress” and had been “going very well so far”. “If the talks succeed in Bajaur Agency, then the TTP will sign a comprehensive truce with the government,” he had told reporters.

After the statement, the TTP leadership replaced Maulvi Faqir with Maulvi Jamaluddin, also known as Mullah Dadullah. Jamaluddin was killed in a NATO airstrike in Afghanistan’s Kunar province on August 24, 2012, after which Maulvi Abu Bakar was named the new commander of the TTP Bajaur chapter.

Faqir was a close confidante of Baitullah Mehsud, the former TTP chief who was killed in a US drone strike in August 2009. Faqir announced himself the new chief of TTP after the killing of Baitullah, but withdrew after the Taliban council appointed Hakimullah Mehsud the new chief. Some media reports suggest that Faqir reconciled with the TTP in late 2012, but he was not reinstated to his former position.

Before joining the ranks of Taliban, Faqir was an active member of Tehrik-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM), founded by Maulana Sufi Muhammad. The teaching and preaching of Sufi Muhammad has contributed to the radicalization of a vast area of Bajaur. After the US arrival in Afghanistan that followed 9/11, Sufi Muhammad gathered about 10,000 armed fighters to wage a jihad against US forces in Afghanistan.

Security experts and officials in Pakistan and Afghanistan believe Faqir’s arrest would be a great blow to the insurgency in the region. “Faqir-led militants have operated from their hideouts in Kunar and Nuristan provinces of Afghanistan since they were forced out of Bajaur by Pakistani military offensives,” said a retired military official who monitors militancy in FATA region.

Confirming the arrest, Pakistani officials said they would ask the Interpol to hand him over to them. “We hope Maulvi Faqir will be handed over to Pakistan as soon as possible because he has the blood of many innocent Pakistanis on his hands,” the Foreign Ministry spokesman said at a briefing.

But Afghanistan declined to hand him over to Pakistan, saying there was no extradition treaty between Islamabad and Kabul.

“During the recent tripartite meeting in London, the Afghan government requested the Pakistani side to return Afghan Taliban prisoners held by it so that they could participate in and support Afghanistan’s peace and reconciliation efforts,” Janan Musazai, the Afghan Foreign Ministry spokesman, told Pajhwok News.

“The Afghan government still believes the return of Afghan Taliban prisoners to Kabul is in the best interest of a meaningful peace process, and the Afghan government is prepared to discuss this with Pakistan,” he said.

Both countries accuse each other of harbouring wanted militants. Stopping the free movement of fighters across the porous border is high on the agenda of any talks between the neighbours. The Afghan government alleges that Pakistani militants operating in FATA carry out subversive attacks in Afghanistan, and that the Pakistani government is protecting the Haqqani Network in North Waziristan. Pakistan alleges that Maulana Fazlullah, Hakimullah Mehsud and other TTP men use the Afghan soil to carry out attacks in Pakistan.

Sardar Ahmed Yousafzai, a security analyst based in Peshawar, said the Kabul government had declined to hand Faqir over because there was no prisoner exchange agreement between the two countries. Islamabad had also declined to hand over Mullah Baradar to Afghanistan despite several official requests.

Security analysts in Afghanistan say the killing of Maulvi Nazir in a drone strike and the arrest of Maulvi Faqir will benefit Afghanistan and the NATO forces, because their men had peace deals with Pakistan and were targeting Afghan and NATO soldiers.

Local tribal elders say the capture would significantly hurt militancy in Bajaur area. “Although Faqir did not have a position in the TTP after he began talking to the Pakistani government, and his men were not carrying out attacks inside Pakistan, his detention will affect militancy in the area,” said a Salarzai-tribal elder in Bajaur.

The writer is a journalist and security analyst. Email: zia_red@hotmail.com and Twitter: zalmayzia.

jamestown

Pakistan’s Tribal Militants: A Militant Leadership Monitor Special Report

Profile of Dr. Allah Nazar Baloch, Leader of Baloch Liberation Front

by Zia Ur Rehman

jm

Please Subscribe here so that you can read the full article.

ctc sentinel

Author : Zia Ur Rehman

February 20, 2013

http://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/the-significance-of-maulvi-nazirs-death-in-pakistan

On January 2, 2013, a U.S. drone strike killed Maulvi Nazir in South Waziristan Agency in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA).[1] Nazir, a senior Taliban commander, was closely aligned with the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network, and the Hafiz Gul Bahadur Taliban faction, yet he had an antagonistic relationship with Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).[2] Nazir was the leader of one of four major militant factions in FATA, and he was accused of sending fighters to neighboring Afghanistan to attack NATO and Afghan troops.[3] Yet unlike the TTP, Nazir was opposed to attacking targets inside Pakistan.[4] His refusal to attack Pakistan allowed the country’s military to forge a non-aggression pact with his faction, which served Pakistan’s strategy of isolating the TTP.[5]

Although Nazir’s death will likely hurt the Afghan Taliban, it marks a positive development for the TTP. Nazir led one of the few militias willing to challenge the TTP, and his fighters engaged in occasional skirmishes with the group. The TTP even reportedly tried to assassinate Nazir in November 2012.[6] Unless Nazir’s successor is able to project strength quickly, the TTP may be emboldened by the loss of this rival leader. This might place more pressure on Pakistan’s security forces if Nazir’s death enables the TTP to focus more resources against the Pakistani state.

This article examines Nazir’s significance in Pakistan and Afghanistan, assesses the overall implications of his death for the United States and Pakistan, as well as provides a short profile of his successor, Bahawal Khan.

Maulvi Nazir’s Significance
Maulvi Nazir was born in 1975 in Birmel, a town in Afghanistan’s Paktika Province, located only five-and-a-half miles from the Pakistan border.[7] He belonged to the Kakakhel tribe, a sub-clan of the Ahmedzai Wazir.[8] As is typical in the region, his family lived on both sides of the Durand Line separating Afghanistan and Pakistan.[9] While in Birmel, Nazir reportedly studied at a religious seminary.[10] He later expanded on his studies as a student of Maulana Noor Muhammad at Darul Uloom Waziristan, located in Wana, South Waziristan Agency.[11]

He joined the Taliban movement in 1996 and fought against the Northern Alliance.[12] After the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, Nazir returned to Wana and became actively involved in supporting al-Qa`ida and Taliban activities in South Waziristan.[13] He was arrested by Pakistan’s security forces in 2004, but was later released under the Shakai peace deal that was signed between Taliban commander Nek Muhammad and the Pakistan Army.[14]

After his release, Nazir moved back to Wana, where he became the top militant leader in the area by 2006-2007.[15] His network stretched into southwestern Afghanistan, to include Paktika, Zabul, Helmand and up to Kandahar.[16] His fighters primarily consisted of members of the Ahmadzai Wazir tribe, who inhabit the western and southern areas of South Waziristan.[17] The modern guerrilla techniques employed by al-Qa`ida fighters inspired Nazir, who also worked on improving the skills of his own fighters.[18] In an interview, Nazir said that “al-Qa`ida and the Taliban are one and the same. At an operational level, we might have different strategies, but at the policy level, we are one and the same.”[19] A number of key al-Qa`ida leaders—such as Ilyas Kashmiri, Abu Khabab al-Masri, Osama al-Kini, Shaykh Ahmad Salim Swedan, and Abu Zaid al-Iraqi—were killed in U.S. drone strikes while reportedly under Nazir’s protection.[20]

Nazir became the top militant leader in the Wana area after he successfully challenged local militant leaders Haji Sharif, Maulana Abbas and Haji Omar—all considered key supporters of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU).[21] After establishing control in these areas in 2007, Nazir confronted the foreign Uzbek militant presence, accusing them of robbing and killing Ahmadzai Wazir tribesmen and imposing their self-styled Shari`a on local inhabitants.[22]

With the support of his Ahmedzai Wazir tribe and the assistance of Pakistan’s military, Nazir successfully flushed the Uzbek militants from Wana in 2007, an action that angered the TTP. Baitullah Mehsud had a long relationship with the IMU, even before he created the TTP. IMU leader Tahir Yuldashev offered his fighters to Baitullah when the latter decided to attack the Pakistani state.[23] The TTP provided sanctuary for the IMU in exchange for its assistance in fighting Pakistani security forces.[24] As these local commanders and their allied Uzbek militants left the area, Nazir became the sole Taliban leader around Wana.[25]

Nazir’s attack on the Uzbeks, as well as his disagreement with the TTP over attacking the Pakistani state, eventually caused conflict between Nazir’s Taliban faction and the TTP.[26] In January 2008, fighting broke out between the two groups in South Waziristan.[27] Periodic skirmishes continue through the present day.[28] In November 2012, Nazir barely avoided death after a suicide bomber—thought to be from the TTP—tried to assassinate him.[29] Yet his life was ultimately ended by a U.S. drone on January 2, 2013.

Implications for the United States and Pakistan
U.S. officials and security analysts argue that Nazir’s death will benefit the United States because he headed one of the three major militant groups in the Waziristan region that focus attacks on U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan, as well as provide protection for al-Qa`ida fighters.[30] In 2009 and 2010, Nazir reportedly helped deploy hundreds of well-trained “Punjabi” Taliban militants of Pakistani origin inside Afghan territory to pressure U.S. and coalition forces ahead of their withdrawal.[31] One U.S. official told the New York Times that “while it is too soon to tell, the death of Nazir, along with some of his deputies, could push his network into disarray, degrading Al Qaeda’s access to South Waziristan as a result.”[32]

For Pakistan, however, Nazir’s death is more complicated. Pakistan’s military and Nazir’s faction were operating under a non-aggression pact, and violent incidents between the two were rare. Nazir was also at war with the TTP, the latter of which is Pakistan’s primary domestic security threat.[33] Pakistan even offered support to Nazir’s faction against the TTP.[34] Nazir’s death could mean that the TTP can free up resources to attack Pakistani targets.[35]

Through the pro-government Nazir faction, Pakistan’s military was trying to instigate a tribal uprising against the TTP in South Waziristan and flush out the TTP’s Mehsud militants from the territory, as well as increase disunity among all the Taliban groups.[36] The government has encouraged local tribesmen to form lashkars (tribal militias) to eliminate “hard-core al-Qa`ida elements and their affiliates especially the TTP,” who have increasingly challenged the writ of the state by mounting deadly terrorist attacks inside Pakistan.[37] Forging good relations with Nazir’s successor is likely Pakistan’s top priority so that peace can continue with the Ahmedzai Wazir of South Waziristan.

Nazir’s Successor: Bahawal Khan
After Nazir’s killing, Bahawal Khan (also known as Salahuddin Ayubi) was announced as the new chief of Wana’s Taliban militants. Khan is reportedly a 34-year-old illiterate former bus driver.[38] He has long been a close associate of Nazir, as the two men fought together with the Taliban in Afghanistan before the U.S.-led invasion in 2001.[39] He was the Taliban commander for the Speen area of South Waziristan.[40] Although Qari Ziaur Rahman was Maulvi Nazir’s deputy, the council of Wana-based militants agreed to nominate Khan because he is a veteran jihadist commander who remained close to Nazir. Khan initially refused to accept the leadership position, but agreed after elders and militant commanders in the area insisted he should become the new chief.[41]

Analysts describe Khan as more hot tempered than Nazir.[42] Nevertheless, some believe that Khan will be able to maintain cohesion within the ranks.[43] Others argue that Khan may prove less operationally or strategically important as Nazir, as he will have to live under constant threat of drone strikes.[44]

In the wake of Nazir’s killing, some analysts say his successor and followers may now turn their guns on civilian and military targets in Pakistan because they suspect that Pakistan’s security establishment is consenting to drone attacks.[45] According to this theory, one negative outcome from Nazir’s death is that the peace agreement between the Pakistani government and Nazir’s faction will collapse, and followers of Nazir and Hafiz Gul Bahadur in North Waziristan will join together with the TTP.[46] Such a development would be dangerous for Pakistan, although there is no evidence that this has occurred.[47]

Others argue that Nazir’s killing will weaken his faction dramatically, and allow the TTP to take advantage in Wana.[48] Pakistan’s military has struggled to maintain a strategic balance in the Waziristan region by entering into peace deals with some of the area’s militant factions—with the goal of isolating the TTP. The loss of Nazir means that there will be less pressure from this group on the TTP, providing it with opportunities to strengthen and expand its presence and influence back into the Wana area of South Waziristan, which was previously dominated by Nazir.[49]

Conclusion
Nazir’s death is a loss to the insurgency in neighboring Afghanistan, and it could also hurt the Afghan Taliban’s sanctuaries in the Pakistani tribal region. For the United States, Nazir’s death might weaken the insurgency in Afghanistan and also possibly damage Pakistan’s strategy of negotiating with militant groups friendly to its interests.[50]

Nazir’s death could be a contentious issue between Washington and Islamabad since the Pakistani military views commanders such as Nazir as useful in keeping the peace domestically. His death may now create a power vacuum, and possibly spark a tribal war that will leave Pakistan to deal with the consequent instability.

Zia Ur Rehman is a journalist and researcher who covers militancy in Pakistan. He has written for The Friday Times, The Jamestown Foundation, The News International, The National and has contributed to the New York Times.

[1] “Two Attacks Leave 12 Dead: ‘Good Taliban’ Maulvi Nazir Killed by Drone,” Dawn, January 3, 2013.

[2] “Pakistan Militant Mullah Nazir Killed ‘in Drone Attack,’” BBC, January 3, 2013.

[3]  These factions are the Haqqani network, the Hafiz Gul Bahadar faction, the TTP, and Maulvi Nazir’s faction.

[4] He was closely allied with Hafiz Gul Bahadar, whose territory is in North Waziristan Agency. Bahadar’s faction shares Maulvi Nazir’s targeting selection, as they both choose to concentrate attacks in Afghanistan and not in Pakistan.

[5]  Personal interview, Ahmed Wali Mujeeb, a Pashtun journalist who has covered militancy in the region, January 5, 2013.

[6]  Amir Mir, “Key Taliban Coalition Falling Apart After Nazir Attack,” The News International, December 5, 2012.

[7] Chris Harnish, “Question Mark of South Waziristan: Biography and Analysis of Maulvi Nazir Ahmad,” Critical Threats Project, July 17, 2009; “Profile: The ‘Good’ Taliban Leader,” Express Tribune, January 4, 2012.

[8]  Zulfiqar Ali, “Mullah Nazir’s Death: New Taliban Chief Named in South Waziristan,” Express Tribune, January 5, 2012.

[9]  Ibid.

[10] “Profile: The ‘Good’ Taliban Leader.”

[11] Ibid.

[12] Rahimullah Yusufzai, “Eviction or Safe Passage?” Newsline, May 10, 2007.

[13]  Personal interview, Wana-based journalist, January 5, 2013.

[14] “Profile: The ‘Good’ Taliban Leader.”

[15] Personal interview, Ahmed Wali Mujeeb, a Pashtun journalist who has covered militancy in the region, January 5, 2013.

[16]  Syed Saleem Shahzad, “Taliban and al-Qaeda: Friends in Arms,” Asia Times Online, May 5, 2011.

[17]  Ibid.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Amir Mir, “Maulvi Nazir’s Death Irks Security Establishment,” The News International, January 4, 2013.

[21] Mansoor Khan Mahsud, “The Battle for Pakistan: Militancy and Conflict in South Waziristan,” New America Foundation, April 2010.

[22]  Adil Shahzeb, “The Mullah and the Military,” The Friday Times, January 11, 2013.

[23]  Amir Mir, “TTP Using Uzbeks to Conduct Terrorist Attacks,” The News International, December 18, 2012.

[24]  Ibid.

[25] Personal interview, Ahmed Wali Mujeeb, a Pashtun journalist who has covered militancy in the region, January 5, 2013.

[26] Iqbal Khattak, “Wazir Tribes Ratify New Militant Bloc,” Daily Times, July 9, 2008; personal interview, Pir Zubair Shah, a former New York Times reporter who is from South Waziristan, November 28, 2012.

[27]  Harnish.

[28] See, for example, “Hakimullah’s Men Clash with Nazir Group; Three Killed,” Dawn, August 19, 2010; “Clash Between Militants Groups Claimed Five People,” FATA Research Center, August 6, 2012.

[29] Zia Ur Rehman, “Waziristan After Maulvi Nazir,” The Friday Times, January 11, 2013; Mir, “Key Taliban Coalition Falling Apart After Nazir Attack.”

[30]  The Pentagon said that Nazir’s death would represent a “major development.” See Salman Masood and Ismail Khan, “Drone Kills a Pakistani Militant Behind Attacks on U.S. Forces,” New York Times, January 3, 2013; “Mullah Nazir’s Death a ‘Major Development’: US,” Express Tribune, January 4, 2013.

[31]  M. Ilyas Khan, “Taliban’s Mullah Nazir Death Spells Trouble for Pakistan,” BBC, January 3, 2013.

[32]  Masood and Khan.

[33]  Mir, “Maulvi Nazir’s Death Irks Security Establishment.”

[34]  Ibid.

[35]  Personal interview, a Wana-based journalist, January 5, 2013.

[36] Ibid.

[37] Zia Ur Rehman, “Tribal Militias are Double-edged Weapon,” The Friday Times, September 30, 2011.

[38] “Bahawal Khan to Succeed Pakistan Militant Leader Mullah Nazir,” BBC, January 4, 2013.

[39] Ibid.

[40] Mushtaq Yusufzai, “Shops, Markets in Wana Remain Closed Amid Tense Calm,” The News International, January 5, 2013.

[41] Irfan Burki and Mushtaq Yousafzai, “Maulvi Nazir Among 10 Killed in Drone Strikes,” The News International, January 4, 2013.

[42]  Personal interview, Ijaz Khan, a Peshawar-based security analyst, January 12, 2013.

[43]  “Bahawal Khan to Succeed Pakistan Militant Leader Mullah Nazir.”

[44]  Shahzeb.

[45] Taha Siddiqui, “Good Taliban, Bad Taliban? Pakistani Commander’s Killing Exposes Blurry Lines,” Christian Science Monitor, January 5, 2013.

[46]  Shamim Shahid, “Luck Runs Out for Mullah Nazir,” Pakistan Today, January 4, 2013.

[47]  Ibid.

[48]  Personal interview, Ijaz Khan, a Peshawar-based security analyst, January 12, 2013.

[49]  Personal interview, Ahmed Wali Mujeeb, a Pashtun journalist who has covered militancy in the region, January 5, 2013.

[50]  Personal interview, a retired Pakistani military officer, January 5, 2013.

tft-logo

 

 

By Zia Ur Rehman

Feb 22-28, 2013

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130222&page=3

Twenty-four political parties and religious groups recommended talks with the Taliban as “first priority” in any strategy to restore peace in the country, in a joint declaration at the end of the all parties’ conference convened by the Awami National Party (ANP) on February 14. Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf and Jamaat-e-Islami were not among them.

Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) rejected the offer. “It is just an election move by the ANP,” Taliban spokesman Ehasanullah Ehsan told a local reporter. At a meeting of the TTP’s political council, 32 commanders from FATA, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, Balochistan, Sindh and Kashmir agreed there was nothing new about the offer, he said. “We still await a serious and result-oriented response from the security forces and the government to our dialogue offer,” Ehsan said.

The ANP organized the conference at a time when it is about to complete its five-year term as a coalition partner in the government. The TTP has made two recent offers for negotiations, asking for veteran political leaders Fazlur Rehman, Nawaz Sharif and Munawar Hasan to act as guarantors. But it wants the government to release five of its senior leaders, including Haji Muslim Khan, former spokesman for the Malakand Taliban, Mahmood Khan, a close aide of Swat Taliban leader Maulana Fazlullah, and Maulvi Omar, the former TTP spokesman. The leaders would represent the Pakistani Taliban in negotiations with the government, they said.

“Despite having suffered so much at the hands of Taliban militants, the ANP is ready to talk to them for peace in the region,” said a parliamentarian from Swat who belongs to the party. “But their demands are very complicated.” He said there were concerns about security in the militancy-hit parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA, if the security forces withdrew as part of a truce.

“That is why the ANP convened the conference.” All key political parties and religious groups participated in the conference and supported the proposal for talks, he said, except Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf (PTI) and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI).

Jan Achakzai, an Islamabad-based security expert, said that despite challenges, the fact that the ANP brought many different parties on one table was a feat in itself. But, he added, the challenges are immense. The media is not convinced talks with the Taliban will be useful, the civil society is critical of such moves, and ex-army analysts and commentators are angry.

As pointed out by the TTP spokesman, there were no clear roadmaps or goalposts in the final communique. “Apparently, the main stakeholder – the army – was to be taken on board before any possible roadmaps were drawn,” Achakzai said.

On the other hand, the PTI and the JI, two strong proponents of peace talks with Taliban militants, did not participate in the conference because they believe, like the TTP, that it was a political gimmick by the ANP.

“The ANP supported Pakistan’s participation in the war on terror for the last five years, which has cost the nation over 60,000 lives and an estimated $100 billion,” said Abdul Quayyum Kundi, a member of PTI’s Advisory Committee and its possible candidate from DI Khan district. “The PTI on the other hand has always supported peace talks to resolve the issue.” Achakzai believes that PTI simply did not want the ANP to steal its position on talks with the Taliban.

After the growing uncertainty over the ANP’s ability to hold the talks, Fazlur Rehman’s faction of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam decided to convene a grand tribal Jirga. “We will invite tribal elders in the Jirga because they know Taliban very well,” Abdul Ghafoor Haidri, the JUI-F secretary general, told reporters. Sources in the party say Fazlur Rehman has discussed the issue with ANP chief Asfandyar Wali and they have agreed to take the proposal forward.

Political observers disagree on whether talks with the Taliban will be effective. “Since the surfacing of Pakistani Taliban, the government has brokered several truces with various Taliban factions in attempts to pacify the militants.” said Sardar Ahmed Yousafzai, a Swat-based political analyst. “But almost all of them resulted in further strengthening and emboldening of these militant groups.” He said that in the 2008 election, the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa voted for the ANP and the JUI-F to bring peace in the area, and they must make concrete efforts to end militancy.

Civil society organizations have their own reservations. When the ANP was organizing the conference in Islamabad, TTP militants killed nearly 20 innocent people in Bannu and Hangu districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. On the very next day, they carried out a failed attempt to assassinate Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister Amir Haider Hoti in Mardan. “It indicates the Taliban are not interested in peace talks and our politicians are just trying to appease them,” said a Peshawar-based civil society activist. He said Taliban leaders enforce their demands, but the government fails to do the same.